The North, in an unrestrained intercourse with the South, protected by
the equal Laws of a common government, finds, in the productions of the
latter, great additional resources of maritime and commercial enterprise
and precious materials of manufacturing industry. The South in the same
intercourse, benefitting by the agency of the North, sees its agriculture
grow and its commerce expand. Turning partly into its own channels the
seamen of the North, it finds its particular navigation invigorated; and
while it contributes, in different ways, to nourish and increase the
general mass of the national navigation, it looks forward to the
protection of a maritime strength, to which itself is unequally adapted.
The East, in a like intercourse with the West, already finds, and in the
progressive improvement of interior communications, by land and water,
will more and more find, a valuable vent for the commodities which it
brings from abroad, or manufactures at home. The West derives from the
East supplies requisite to its growth and comfort, and what is perhaps of
still greater consequence, it must of necessity owe the secure enjoyment
of indispensable outlets for its own productions to the weight, influence,
and the future maritime strength of the Atlantic side of the Union,
directed by an indissoluble community of interest as one Nation. Any other
tenure by which the West can hold this essential advantage, whether
derived from its own separate strength, or from an apostate and unnatural
connection with any foreign power, must be intrinsically precarious. |
|
These considerations speak a persuasive language to every reflecting and
virtuous mind, and exhibit the continuance of the UNION as a primary
object of patriotic desire. Is there a doubt whether a common government
can embrace so large a sphere? Let experience solve it. To listen to mere
speculation in such a case were criminal. We are authorized to hope that
a proper organization of the whole, with the auxiliary agency of
governments for the respective subdivisions, will afford a happy issue to
the experiment. It is well worth a fair and full experiment. With such
powerful and obvious motives to union, affecting all parts of our country,
while experience shall not have demonstrated its impracticability, there
will always be reason to distrust the patriotism of those who in any
quarter may endeavor to weaken its bands. |
In contemplating the causes which may disturb our Union, it occurs as
matter of serious concern, that any ground should have been furnished for
characterizing parties by geographical discriminations, Northern and
Southern, Atlantic and Western; whence designing men may endeavor to
excite a belief that there is a real difference of local interests and
views. One of the expedients of party to acquire influence, within
particular districts, is to misrepresent the opinions and aims of other
districts. You cannot shield yourselves too much against the jealousies
and heart burnings which spring from these misrepresentations; they tend
to render alien to each other those who ought to be bound together by
fraternal affection. The inhabitants of our western country have lately
had a useful lesson on this head; they have seen, in the negotiation by
the Executive, and in the unanimous ratification by the Senate, of the
treaty with Spain, and in the universal satisfaction at that event,
throughout the United States, a decisive proof how unfounded were the
suspicions propagated among them of a policy in the general Government
and in the Atlantic States unfriendly to their interests in regard to
the Mississippi; they have been witnesses to the formation of two
treaties, that with Great Britain, and that with Spain, which secure to
them everything they could desire, in respect to our foreign relations,
towards confirming their prosperity. Will it not be their wisdom to
rely for the preservation of these advantaged on the UNION by which
they were procured? Will they not henceforth be deaf to those advisers,
if such there are, who would sever them from their brethren and connect
them with aliens? |
To the efficacy and permanency of your Union, a government for the whole
is indispensable. No alliances, however strict, between the parts can be
an adequate substitute; they must inevitably experience the infractions and
interruptions which all alliances in all times have experienced. Sensible
of this momentous truth, you have improved upon your first essay, by the
adoption of a constitution of government better calculated than your
former for an intimate union, and for the efficacious management of your
common concerns. This government, the offspring of our own choice,
uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature
deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the distribution of
its powers uniting security with energy, and containing within itself a
provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence and
your support. Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws,
acquiescence in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental
maxims of true liberty. The basis of our political systems is the right
of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government.
But the constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an
explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory
upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to
establish government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the
established government. |
All obstructions to the execution of the Laws, all combinations and
associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design
to direct, control counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action
of the constituted authorities are destructive of this fundamental
principle and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give
it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the
delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but
artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the
alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration
the mirror of the illconcerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather
than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common
councils, and modified by mutual interests. |
However combinations or associations of the above description may now and
then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and
things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious and
unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and
to usurp for themselves the reins of Government; destroying afterwards
the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion. |
Towards the preservation of your Government and the permanency of your
present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily
discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but
also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its
principles, however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may be
to effect, in the forms of the constitution, alterations which will impair
the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly
overthrown. In all the changes to which you may be invited, remember that
time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of
governments, as of other human institutions; that experience is the surest
standard by which to test the real tendency of the existing constitution
of a country; that facility in changes, upon the credit of mere hypotheses
and opinion, exposes to perpetual change, from the endless variety of
hypotheses and opinion; and remember, especially, that, for the efficient
management of your common interests, in a country so extensive as ours, a
government of as much vigor as is consistent with the perfect security of
liberty is indispensable. Liberty itself will find in such a Government,
with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest guardian. It
is, indeed, little else than a name, where the government is too feeble
to withstand the enterprise of faction, to confine each member of the
society within the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all in
the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person and property. |
I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the state, with
particular reference to the founding of them on geographical
discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you
in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of
party, generally. |
This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its
root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under
different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or
repressed; but in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest
rankness, and is truly their worst enemy. |
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the
spirit of revenge, natural to party dissention, which in different ages
and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a
frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and
permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually
incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power
of an individual, and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing
faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this
disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public
liberty. |
Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless
ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs
of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of
a wise people to discourage and restrain it. |
It serves always to distract the public councils, and enfeeble the public
administration. It agitates the community with ill founded jealousies and
false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments
occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign
influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the
government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy
and the will of one country, are subjected to the policy and will of
another. |
There is an opinion, that parties in free countries are useful checks upon
the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of
liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments
of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with
favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character,
in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged.
From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of
that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger
of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate
and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance
to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should
consume. |
It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country
should inspire caution, in those entrusted with its administration, to
confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres,
avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon
another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of
all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of
government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and
proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is
sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of
reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and
distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the
guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been
evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country
and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to
institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or
modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong,
let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution
designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this,
in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon
by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always
greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit
which the use can at any time yield. |
Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity,
religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man
claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great
pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and
citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to
respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their
connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked,
Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense
of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of
investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the
supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may
be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar
structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national
morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. |
'Tis substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of
popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to
every species of free government. Who that is a sincere friend to it, can
look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric? |
Promote, then, as an object of primary importance, institutions for the
general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of a
government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public
opinion should be enlightened. |
As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit.
One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible; avoiding
occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely
disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater
disbursements to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not
only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions in time of
peace to discharge the debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned,
not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves
ought to bear. The execution of these maxims belongs to your
representatives, but it is necessary that public opinion should cooperate.
To facilitate to them the performance of their duty, it is essential that
you should practically bear in mind, that towards the payment of debts
there must be revenue; that to have revenue there must be taxes; that no
taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient and
unpleasant; that the intrinsic embarrassment inseparable from the
selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties),
ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of
the government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the
measures for obtaining revenue which the public exigencies may at any time
dictate. |
Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and
harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it
be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be worthy of a
free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great nation, to give to
mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided
by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt that, in the course
of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any
temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it? Can
it be, that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a
nation with its virtue? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every
sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by
its vices? |
In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that
permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and
passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place
of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The
nation which indulges towards another an habitual hatred, or an habitual
fondness, is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to
its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its
duty and its interest. Antipathy in one Nation against another disposes
each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes
of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling
occasions of dispute occur. Hence frequent collisions, obstinate,
envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill will and
resentment sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best
calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the
national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject;
at other times, it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to
projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister
and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the Liberty,
of nations has been the victim. |
So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a
variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the
illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common
interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays
the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter,
without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to
concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which
is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions: by
unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained; and by
exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the
parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to
ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the
favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their
own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with
the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference
for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base of
foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation. |
As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are
particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot.
How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to
practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or
awe the public councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a
great and powerful nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the
latter. |
Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe
me, fellow-citizens), the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly
awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of
the most baneful foes of republican government. |
But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial; else it becomes the
instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defence
against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive
dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on
one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the
other. Real Patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are
liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the
applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests. |
The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in
extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political
connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let
them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. |
Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very
remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the
causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence therefore,
it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves, by artificial ties, in the
ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and
collisions of her friendships or enmities. |
Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a
different course. If we remain one people, under an efficient government,
the period is not far off, when we may defy material injury from external
annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality
we may at any time resolve upon, to be scrupulously respected; when
belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon
us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose
peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel. |
Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to
stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of
any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of
European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice? |
`Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any
portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to
do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity
to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public
than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat
it therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense.
But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them. |
Taking care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a
respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances
for extraordinary emergencies. |
Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy,
humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an
equal and impartial hand: neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors
or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and
diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing;
establishing with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable
course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the
government to support them, conventional rules of intercourse, the best
that present circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary,
and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied, as experience and
circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view, that `tis folly
in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must
pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under
that character; that, by such acceptance, it may place itself in the
condition of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet of
being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no
greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to
nation. 'Tis an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride
ought to discard. |
In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an old and
affectionate friend, I dare not hope they will make the strong and lasting
impression I could wish; that they will control the usual current of the
passions, or prevent our nation from running the course which has hitherto
marked the destiny of nations. But if I may even flatter myself that they
may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional good; that
they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn
against the mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the
impostures of pretended patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense
for the solicitude for your welfare by which they have been dictated. |
How far in the discharge of my official duties I have been guided by the
principles which have been delineated, the public records and other
evidences of my conduct must witness to you and to the world. To myself,
the assurance of my own conscience is, that I have at least believed
myself to be guided by them. |
In relation to the still subsisting war in Europe, my proclamation of the
22d of April, 1793, is the index to my plan. Sanctioned by your approving
voice, and by that of your representatives in both Houses of Congress, the
spirit of that measure has continually governed me, uninfluenced by any
attempts to deter or divert me from it. |
After deliberate examination, with the aid of the best lights I could
obtain, I was well satisfied that our country, under all the circumstances
of the case, had a right to take, and was bound in duty and interest to
take, a neutral position. Having taken it, I determined, as far as should
depend upon me, to maintain it, with moderation, perseverance, and
firmness. |
The considerations which respect the right to hold this conduct, it is not
necessary on this occasion to detail. I will only observe that, according
to my understanding of the matter, that right, so far from being denied by
any of the belligerent powers, has been virtually admitted by all. |
The duty of holding a neutral conduct may be inferred, without any thing
more, from the obligation which justice and humanity impose on every
nation, in cases in which it is free to act, to maintain inviolate the
relations of peace and amity towards other nations. |
The inducements of interest for observing that conduct will best be
referred to your own reflections and experience. With me, a predominant
motive has been to endeavor to gain time to our country to settle and
mature its yet recent institutions, and to progress without interruption
to that degree of strength and consistency which is necessary to give it,
humanly speaking, the command of its own fortunes. |
Though, in reviewing the incidents of my administration, I am unconscious
of intentional error, I am nevertheless too sensible of my defects not to
think it probable that I may have committed many errors. Whatever they
may be, I fervently beseech the Almighty to avert or mitigate the evils to
which they may tend. I shall also carry with me the hope, that my country
will never cease to view them with indulgence; and that, after forty-five
years of my life dedicated to its service with an upright zeal, the faults
of incompetent abilities will be consigned to oblivion, as myself must
soon be to the mansions of rest. |
Relying on its kindness in this as in other things, and actuated by that
fervent love towards it which is so natural to a man who views in it the
native soil of himself and his progenitors for several generations, I
anticipate with pleasing expectation that retreat in which I promise
myself to realize, without alloy, the sweet enjoyment of partaking, in the
midst of my fellow citizens, the benign influence of good laws under a
free government, the ever favorite object of my heart, and the happy
reward, as I trust, of our mutual cares, labors and dangers. |
George Washington
United States, 17th September 1796
This address was written primarily to eliminate himself as a candidate
for a third term. It was never read by the President in public, but it was
printed in Claypoole's AMERICAN DAILY ADVERTISER, Philadelphia,
September 19, 1796. |
George Washington gave Claypoole a manuscript which he called "his copy"
and it was from this manuscript that the type was set in the newspaper.
After Claypoole's death, the manuscript was ordered to be sold at auction
on February 12, 1850. Senator Henry Clay on January 24 offered a joint
resolution for its purchase by the government, but the resolution was not
signed by President Taylor until the day of the sale. The manuscript was
sold to James Lenox for $2,300, and passed, with his library, to the New
York Public Library. There is no evidence of any bid on behalf of the
national government. |
This is an exact word for word text of the original. Nothing has
been changed or omitted except old English spelling and punctuation. |
[ Go Back ]