Here we go again. Another fake march by a fake "nonpartisan" group trying to
fake-out America. Led by Donna Dees-Thomases, the latest pied-piper of
constitutional reengineering, a million "moms" (give or take 900,000,
depending on who's counting) marched on DC to persuade American women to
revoke the second amendment. In their twisted logic, these women believe if
we all toss our guns in a river, crime will disappear.
Let's quote directly from the Million Moms website:
"While we acknowledge that guns may be necessary for hunting, law
enforcement, and national security, the proliferation of firearms intended
for one purpose only - killing another human being - has become untenable."
Untenable? Let me offer personal assurance that when the next rapist drags
one of these disarmed ditzes off the street, she will beg for the touch of a
cold and cocked Glock 45. Without a trigger lock. Because Chuck Schumer won't
come rescue her. Rosie O'Donnell won't drop by to harangue the guy to death.
Donna Dees-Thomases won't march a million women into the bushes and drag the
guy out. These hypocrites who enjoy armed protection 24/7 will never be there
to help. Without a gun to defend herself, the next rape victim will meekly
submit to violation and humiliation at the least, violent and bloody murder
at the worst. In that instant before she dies, the rapist will have converted
his victim into a staunch defender of the second amendment.
Salesmen call this "the hard sell ..."
Who is Donna Dees-Thomases, anyway? And why is she demanding a million
mothers surrender the best safety and defense for their families?
Dees-Thomases is the sister-in-law of Susan Thomases, Hillary's best friend
and staunch defender of the First Family's right to break any law they
please. Her resume includes a stint as publicist for Clinton jock-sniffer Dan
Rather. Dees-Thomases is no "average housewife" newly awakened to the world's
problems. She is a committed liberal Democrat, disguised as a "concerned
mother" to hide her leftist intentions. Like all liberal hacks, Dees-Thomases
must lie about who she is, what she is and her agenda.
This crusade is actually full of lies. Twelve kids a day do not die from gun
violence. Except for late-teen gang-bangers, about 100 children a year die
from accidental gun deaths. Tragic, but less than the 200 who accidentally
suffocate, the 950 who drown, and the 1,000 who are burned. Shall we put
locks on Saran wrap? Outlaw bathtubs and stoves? 2,900 kids die every year in
car accidents. Al Gore and Ted Kennedy jokes aside ... shall we outlaw the
automobile?
You could write a book of irrefutable stats proving these fools are wrong.
Actually, it's been written. Liberal professor John Lott clearly proved lax
gun control actually leads to less crime and strict gun control leads to more
gun crime. The marching mommies may not be aware of this relationship, but
criminals certainly are. In every nation that has tried gun control, violent
crime has risen markedly. So ladies ... why go half way? Save the suspense!
Simply find the nearest rapist, drive over to his house and rip your clothes
off for him.
All sorts of fools are climbing aboard this DNC-sponsored bandwagon. Career
gun-hater and congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy, the irony flying over her head
at warp speed, is making appearances on every talking head show as
cheerleader for these Million Future Victims. Her husband and son didn't have
the foresight to defend themselves against the sick man who mowed them down
in a New York subway. Now, she wants the rest of America to join them.
The ultimate question is: Should we surrender the best defense against
criminal violence in order to prevent 100 accidental gun deaths a year? I
didn't see Dees-Thomases discuss the 2.5 million crimes stopped every year by
firearms. She didn't mention the gun violence liberal Hollywood shoves down
the throat of America's children, either. And she curiously avoids
questioning the Clinton administration phobia of enforcing current gun laws.
Please spare us the charade. Dees-Thomases doesn't give a damn about families
or children. If she did, she would demand that all mothers who really care
about their children arm themselves and teach the kids how and when to use
guns. If some 14-year-old daughter is baby-sitting and some crack-head kicks
the door down, she should know where the gun is, how to use it, and who to
call to pick up the well-ventilated body.
It boils down to this: Before guns, there were knives. Before knives there
were clubs. Before clubs there were rocks. There have never been shortages of
ways to kill each other. But the handgun became the great equalizer. In the
old American West, the saying went, "God created man. Sam Colt made them
equal." Equal power is the antithesis of liberalism. That is why liberals
want guns eliminated. What die-hard liberals like Dees-Thomases want is
victims. Many more. Why? Because Wayne LaPierre was right.
If you recall, LaPierre accused Bill Clinton of accepting tragedy to further
his political agenda. In fact, every liberal idea is specifically designed to
create failure. If welfare was eliminated and we privatized Medicare and
social security, unemployment would disappear, medical costs would drop like
a stone, and we'd all retire millionaires. And if every woman were armed,
4,100 rapes would have not taken place last year. Without victims, liberals
would have to get real jobs as convenience store clerks and such. The very
existence of liberalism depends upon misery, mayhem and violence.
And that is why they want to disarm the entire nation.
Therefore, the problem isn't simply that these naive ladies are willing to
martyr themselves and sacrifice their children to pacify the gods of
liberalism. That is their choice. The real problem is they want the rest of
America to sacrifice our families as well. They are not caring, thinking
mothers. They are a dizzy bunch of helpless dopes marching to their demise,
following partisan liberal political hacks like Donna Dees-Thomases.
In the end, I suppose we shouldn't worry about these ladies. After all,
Democrats such as Thomases, James Carville, and the entire CNN staff spent
the last four years proclaiming women who are assaulted are just a bunch of
silly sluts who are asking for it.
Maybe they have a point.
Written By:
Tom Atkins
E-Mail Tom Atkins
commonconservative.com
Go Back
Go To Main Index
Go to Past Issues